Skip to main content

In Class Topic: Recording

We take advantage of the ability to record daily. We use recorded messages to learn, communicate, listen to music, watch movies, and many other things. Just within music there are so many messages we can convey that wouldn't be possible without recording. This is why Thomas Edison, Berliner and Maxwell are all so important. Granted, others may have been able to come up with the same inventions but who's to say they would be identical or invented in the same time period? The phonograph, gramophone and electronic microphone all pay crucial roles in shaping how our societies interact and function today. When we started talking about this topic in class, I was surprised I had never heard of the exact inventions before, especially the gramophone since it took a rather large leap, making recordings replay-able and the invention itself being so reliable and reproducible. This is one big way we take advantage of being able to record, by not teaching and informing people of the importance of recording in a more widespread way we are not subject to appreciate it like we should.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Response to Betsy DeVos allegedly looking into giving teachers firearms.

     Until it appeared on our first current events quiz, I was unaware that the possibility of arming teachers with guns was truly being looked into. Although it is still just being researched and not actually happening right now, Mr. Miller believes it eventually will, even though the concept is very flawed. He explained that as a teacher he would not be comfortable in possession of a gun nor having students in close proximity to them. The class discussed the possible issues with having guns in schools; a misfiring, a student taking one for his or her own use, poor personal judgement for when it is appropriate to use, the list goes on. I believe this class discussion was crucial to have. Every student should be aware of something that has the potential to effect us so dramatically. We also should have the space to freely discuss how we feel about it. The discussion we had was brought to our class in the right proportion and gave all of us the base information we need but...
Post a Comment
Read more

News Media Critique

    Today, September16th, the Courier Journal posted an article about a Wyoming guide killed by a grizzly bear while looking for an elk in the Teton Wilderness. Click here to read the article. The report violated the element of good journalism newsworthiness.      In order to determine if something is newsworthy, the question, "Does it effect a lot of people for a long time?" must be answered. Without even reading the article, the answer to that question is clear. No, a random guide from Wyoming getting killed does not effect a lot of people for a long time. It was one occurrence that would only effect locals and close family. In general, this story was not deserving of publishing at all however, if it were more thematic it would possibly be relevant enough for publication. For example, if the report talked about a trend of grizzly bears attacking people very often in specific environments, that would effect a much larger group of people. It would make peopl...
Post a Comment
Read more

Response to John's "Ancient Printing Discussion"

In John's blog he discussed the conversation we had in class on Ancient printing, how it evolved and effected societies. John's insight and perspective gave me a new look into the topic. Admittedly, during class I felt this topic was the least interesting we had hit so far. Although I find history very interesting, a decent amount of our conversation in class simply covered how things were printed, whereas I find the effects things have on society more interesting. Inferentially, you may guess I was most captivated by the section of the discussion where we talked about how higher levels of society rejected the metal printing type press made by Gutenberg. John went a further step as to relate this to how those in power today take advantage of printing press to tell us what they want us to hear but how we can still reply on good journalists to tell us what we need to hear. This thought pushes me to think more in depth of the pros and cons of freedom of press.  
Post a Comment
Read more