Skip to main content

Response to John's "Ancient Printing Discussion"

In John's blog he discussed the conversation we had in class on Ancient printing, how it evolved and effected societies. John's insight and perspective gave me a new look into the topic. Admittedly, during class I felt this topic was the least interesting we had hit so far. Although I find history very interesting, a decent amount of our conversation in class simply covered how things were printed, whereas I find the effects things have on society more interesting. Inferentially, you may guess I was most captivated by the section of the discussion where we talked about how higher levels of society rejected the metal printing type press made by Gutenberg.
John went a further step as to relate this to how those in power today take advantage of printing press to tell us what they want us to hear but how we can still reply on good journalists to tell us what we need to hear. This thought pushes me to think more in depth of the pros and cons of freedom of press.  

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Non-newsworthy Story on WHAS

WHAS posted an article on their website announcing that the band KISS' final tour will make a stop at the KFC Yum! Center here in Louisville. While I'm sure there is a decent amount of people who would like to know this, it is not newsworthy. This story will not effect a lot of people for a long time and it's just celebrity fluff. The concert will come and go and people will have a good time but it isn't life changing and not everybody likes KISS. Therefore this article already is only relevant to a small amount of people, those who like the band. While those people would want to know about this, the front spread of a news website is not the place for it. By putting this story on the front page WHAS stole room for other stories that would serve much more valuable to its viewers. Click here to see article.
Post a Comment
Read more

In-class Topic: Television

It isn't hard to realize that TV's are extremely popular. Things like Netflix, Hulu, Firestick, Xbox, Wii, etc. all add to the draw of Television. All of these things are made primarily to be used on a TV. Why? Because the creators know that most people have TV's and use them frequently. Since they came out, TV's have ruled the world of media. There are newspapers and magazines still, but they have greatly demassified. Both of those mediums show ads, tell stories and give news. Television offers all of those things in better ways. TV ads are more interesting, TV offers numerous news channels, and you can find plenty of shows focused on entertainment or information. In addition, you don't have to read TV which I think is a lure for many people, particularly the younger population. Since their invention, TV's have become more and more of household items. Today, it is rare to go into a home without one. Because they are so normalized, the youngest generation see...
Post a Comment
Read more

In Class Topic: Magazines

In between newspapers and television, magazines definitely had their glory days, which I never knew. Magazines introduced multiple concepts we had never had, that we still use today. For example, a national medium to share news. In my opinion, the most valuable thing we got from magazines was the ability to spread American culture nationwide. People were new and just getting the feel for things and establishing rules for how things would run, they needed to be able to communicate and send widespread messages. The first magazine was invented not too long before America was established so they must've played in a big role. People lived in different parts of the new land and wouldn't know what was going on or what things were being sold in different areas if it weren't for magazines. I don't know exactly how, but I believe things back then wouldn't have been the same without magazines, therefore making today somewhat different.
Post a Comment
Read more