Skip to main content

In-class Topic: Television

It isn't hard to realize that TV's are extremely popular. Things like Netflix, Hulu, Firestick, Xbox, Wii, etc. all add to the draw of Television. All of these things are made primarily to be used on a TV. Why? Because the creators know that most people have TV's and use them frequently.
Since they came out, TV's have ruled the world of media. There are newspapers and magazines still, but they have greatly demassified. Both of those mediums show ads, tell stories and give news. Television offers all of those things in better ways. TV ads are more interesting, TV offers numerous news channels, and you can find plenty of shows focused on entertainment or information. In addition, you don't have to read TV which I think is a lure for many people, particularly the younger population.
Since their invention, TV's have become more and more of household items. Today, it is rare to go into a home without one. Because they are so normalized, the youngest generation see's them as just something you have, like a couch or a microwave. Simply, the more time goes on the harder it is to compete with Television.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Response to Betsy DeVos allegedly looking into giving teachers firearms.

     Until it appeared on our first current events quiz, I was unaware that the possibility of arming teachers with guns was truly being looked into. Although it is still just being researched and not actually happening right now, Mr. Miller believes it eventually will, even though the concept is very flawed. He explained that as a teacher he would not be comfortable in possession of a gun nor having students in close proximity to them. The class discussed the possible issues with having guns in schools; a misfiring, a student taking one for his or her own use, poor personal judgement for when it is appropriate to use, the list goes on. I believe this class discussion was crucial to have. Every student should be aware of something that has the potential to effect us so dramatically. We also should have the space to freely discuss how we feel about it. The discussion we had was brought to our class in the right proportion and gave all of us the base information we need but...

News Media Critique

    Today, September16th, the Courier Journal posted an article about a Wyoming guide killed by a grizzly bear while looking for an elk in the Teton Wilderness. Click here to read the article. The report violated the element of good journalism newsworthiness.      In order to determine if something is newsworthy, the question, "Does it effect a lot of people for a long time?" must be answered. Without even reading the article, the answer to that question is clear. No, a random guide from Wyoming getting killed does not effect a lot of people for a long time. It was one occurrence that would only effect locals and close family. In general, this story was not deserving of publishing at all however, if it were more thematic it would possibly be relevant enough for publication. For example, if the report talked about a trend of grizzly bears attacking people very often in specific environments, that would effect a much larger group of people. It would make peopl...

Response to John's "Ancient Printing Discussion"

In John's blog he discussed the conversation we had in class on Ancient printing, how it evolved and effected societies. John's insight and perspective gave me a new look into the topic. Admittedly, during class I felt this topic was the least interesting we had hit so far. Although I find history very interesting, a decent amount of our conversation in class simply covered how things were printed, whereas I find the effects things have on society more interesting. Inferentially, you may guess I was most captivated by the section of the discussion where we talked about how higher levels of society rejected the metal printing type press made by Gutenberg. John went a further step as to relate this to how those in power today take advantage of printing press to tell us what they want us to hear but how we can still reply on good journalists to tell us what we need to hear. This thought pushes me to think more in depth of the pros and cons of freedom of press.