Skip to main content

Response to Betsy DeVos allegedly looking into giving teachers firearms.

     Until it appeared on our first current events quiz, I was unaware that the possibility of arming teachers with guns was truly being looked into. Although it is still just being researched and not actually happening right now, Mr. Miller believes it eventually will, even though the concept is very flawed. He explained that as a teacher he would not be comfortable in possession of a gun nor having students in close proximity to them. The class discussed the possible issues with having guns in schools; a misfiring, a student taking one for his or her own use, poor personal judgement for when it is appropriate to use, the list goes on. I believe this class discussion was crucial to have. Every student should be aware of something that has the potential to effect us so dramatically. We also should have the space to freely discuss how we feel about it. The discussion we had was brought to our class in the right proportion and gave all of us the base information we need but as the story develops I believe it should be brought back up.
     More personally, I believe bringing guns into schools is a disastrous idea with no legal grounds to support it. The Student Support and Academic Enrichment grants, a $1 billion dollar program created in  2015, is where the National Department of Education would get the funds to provide school teachers with guns. The explicit purpose of the program is to provide a well rounded education, improve school conditions for learning, and improve the use of technology for digital literacy. Although the grants give school districts the power to create policies based on their specific needs, the "drug and violence prevention" section names safe schools as weapon free. According to the New York Times, department officials are also aware that the purchase of these firearms would be the first time a federal agency has authorized the purchase of weapons without congressional mandate. Furthermore, purchasing firearms for schools would go against the School Safety Bill which prohibits their use. Although Betsy DeVos could technically use her discretion to bring guns into schools nationwide, it would be blatantly unethical. There is no logic behind bringing more guns into schools when guns are the issue to begin with. Most gun supporters would argue that it's not the guns fault, its the persons but what makes a teacher qualified to use a gun when they are trained to teach? We would be putting thousands of lives at risk. Most importantly, Students should have the first say on if they believe it is the most safe choice. Many may feel that having guns nearby would disrupt their peace and distract their learning. It is our lives at risk and we deserve a voice.  

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Response to the 10 Elements of Good Journalism

     To say the least, I loved listening to this lecture. To open the year talking about something so basic yet so important oriented me to the class. Hearing what such highly trained, long standing journalists think are the most important elements of journalism was so interesting because my love for writing urges me to want to know these standards so I can both use them as guidelines for myself as well as be a good critic of others. During our class discussion, the element of making the important interesting felt the most familiar. I believe this is because when writing, I always strive to capture interest and I know what it feels like to read a book or article you never want to put down. The common goal through my writing in to educate, however, reading something that just spits facts at you can be boring and feel like a burden rather than a thought provoking lesson. Personally, writing poetry particularly has taught me how to articulate my words in a way that is grabbi...
Post a Comment
Read more

News Media Critique

    Today, September16th, the Courier Journal posted an article about a Wyoming guide killed by a grizzly bear while looking for an elk in the Teton Wilderness. Click here to read the article. The report violated the element of good journalism newsworthiness.      In order to determine if something is newsworthy, the question, "Does it effect a lot of people for a long time?" must be answered. Without even reading the article, the answer to that question is clear. No, a random guide from Wyoming getting killed does not effect a lot of people for a long time. It was one occurrence that would only effect locals and close family. In general, this story was not deserving of publishing at all however, if it were more thematic it would possibly be relevant enough for publication. For example, if the report talked about a trend of grizzly bears attacking people very often in specific environments, that would effect a much larger group of people. It would make peopl...
Post a Comment
Read more

Response to John's "Ancient Printing Discussion"

In John's blog he discussed the conversation we had in class on Ancient printing, how it evolved and effected societies. John's insight and perspective gave me a new look into the topic. Admittedly, during class I felt this topic was the least interesting we had hit so far. Although I find history very interesting, a decent amount of our conversation in class simply covered how things were printed, whereas I find the effects things have on society more interesting. Inferentially, you may guess I was most captivated by the section of the discussion where we talked about how higher levels of society rejected the metal printing type press made by Gutenberg. John went a further step as to relate this to how those in power today take advantage of printing press to tell us what they want us to hear but how we can still reply on good journalists to tell us what we need to hear. This thought pushes me to think more in depth of the pros and cons of freedom of press.  
Post a Comment
Read more