Skip to main content

Response to KC's "The Process of Mass Media"

During the class discussion on mass media, the things that crossed my mind and left me thinking were ironically the same things that absorbed KC's attention. She said that while we were talking about the steps to produce mass media, she thought of all the stimuli that have never been followed through on, and how many ideas have come to her that she will never fulfill. This thought, of all the ideas that come to me and I know I will never fulfill or at least wont for a long time, crosses my brain often. There are so many projects I want to do and things I want to learn but there seems to be so little time. 
KC also mentioned when Mr. Miller said that we are constantly receiving radio waves and internet signals. For me, this statement made mass communication through technology feel suddenly much more real and prominent. As KC said, "I did not realize that waves from the radio flow through time and space in that manner. Of course then I have to realize, to be mass media, they have to flow through time and space." Similarly, when Mr. Miller said mass communication travels through time and space, I only thought of how something is recorded, not the actual transportation of the recording. I now understand just how forms of mass communication can travel through time and space. 


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Response to Betsy DeVos allegedly looking into giving teachers firearms.

     Until it appeared on our first current events quiz, I was unaware that the possibility of arming teachers with guns was truly being looked into. Although it is still just being researched and not actually happening right now, Mr. Miller believes it eventually will, even though the concept is very flawed. He explained that as a teacher he would not be comfortable in possession of a gun nor having students in close proximity to them. The class discussed the possible issues with having guns in schools; a misfiring, a student taking one for his or her own use, poor personal judgement for when it is appropriate to use, the list goes on. I believe this class discussion was crucial to have. Every student should be aware of something that has the potential to effect us so dramatically. We also should have the space to freely discuss how we feel about it. The discussion we had was brought to our class in the right proportion and gave all of us the base information we need but...
Post a Comment
Read more

News Media Critique

    Today, September16th, the Courier Journal posted an article about a Wyoming guide killed by a grizzly bear while looking for an elk in the Teton Wilderness. Click here to read the article. The report violated the element of good journalism newsworthiness.      In order to determine if something is newsworthy, the question, "Does it effect a lot of people for a long time?" must be answered. Without even reading the article, the answer to that question is clear. No, a random guide from Wyoming getting killed does not effect a lot of people for a long time. It was one occurrence that would only effect locals and close family. In general, this story was not deserving of publishing at all however, if it were more thematic it would possibly be relevant enough for publication. For example, if the report talked about a trend of grizzly bears attacking people very often in specific environments, that would effect a much larger group of people. It would make peopl...
Post a Comment
Read more

Response to John's "Ancient Printing Discussion"

In John's blog he discussed the conversation we had in class on Ancient printing, how it evolved and effected societies. John's insight and perspective gave me a new look into the topic. Admittedly, during class I felt this topic was the least interesting we had hit so far. Although I find history very interesting, a decent amount of our conversation in class simply covered how things were printed, whereas I find the effects things have on society more interesting. Inferentially, you may guess I was most captivated by the section of the discussion where we talked about how higher levels of society rejected the metal printing type press made by Gutenberg. John went a further step as to relate this to how those in power today take advantage of printing press to tell us what they want us to hear but how we can still reply on good journalists to tell us what we need to hear. This thought pushes me to think more in depth of the pros and cons of freedom of press.  
Post a Comment
Read more