Skip to main content

Response to Dallas police officer killing Botham Jean

    In class, there were multiple stories people had heard to as to how a white police officer allegedly accidentally walked into an apartment not her own, saw a black man and shot him dead. The first story was that Amber Guyger, 4 year member of the Dallas police force, simply parked on the wrong floor after her shift, walked into the wrong apartment thinking it was hers, suspected Mr. Jean was a burglar, and shot him. This is the story most people know, the story that news organizations are telling. Another scenario being that Guyer and Jean were formerly in a relationship and the police officer was looking for revenge. This story is the less popular and most unlikely one. Before it was said in class, I hadn't heard anything about the two knowing each other prior to the shooting. Additionally, what is the likelihood that you and your ex live in the same building, you cant recognize their living space, and their family knew nothing of you? Somebody also heard that the police officer had her hands full of grocery's so she couldn't see that she was entering an apartment with a doormat not her own. But when she walked in, couldn't she see that all of the furniture and items in the apartment weren't hers? How would she be carrying groceries, open the door and be able to shoot somebody all at once? All of the scenarios have flaws that leave many questioning.
     In my opinion, the killing of Botham Jean was due to unfair bias by Amber Guygen. There was no logical reason for the police officer to pull her gun out in the first place. If she did enter the apartment thinking it was her own, most would immediately realize by the surroundings that it isn't theirs, apologize for the intrusion, and leave. Instead, she, the intruder, pulled a gun out on the alarmed and unarmed Botham Jean. Imagine how scary that would be, to have done nothing wrong yet randomly have a police officer walk into your home with no warning and pull out a gun. It is true, the different floors of the apartment complex may have looked very similar so that after a long day, going to the wrong floor is not an absurd concept. The police officer may have been so alarmed that there was somebody in "her" apartment she didn't even pay attention to the apartment interior to realize the furnishings weren't hers, but there is absolutely no excuse for pulling out a gun. Not even the fact that she was a police officer. Especially the fact that she was a police officer because that means she is trained to expect the unexpected. It seems like we never hear of stories like this with whites as the victims. It seems as if Amber Guyger assumed Botham Jean was doing something wrong for no reason other than that he was black and she couldn't pause in the moment to question the ingrained filter that because he was black, he must be doing something wrong. Regardless of how you choose to picture it, Botham Jean, a black man, was murdered while doing nothing but simply living his life, and that happens all too often.
   



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Response to Betsy DeVos allegedly looking into giving teachers firearms.

     Until it appeared on our first current events quiz, I was unaware that the possibility of arming teachers with guns was truly being looked into. Although it is still just being researched and not actually happening right now, Mr. Miller believes it eventually will, even though the concept is very flawed. He explained that as a teacher he would not be comfortable in possession of a gun nor having students in close proximity to them. The class discussed the possible issues with having guns in schools; a misfiring, a student taking one for his or her own use, poor personal judgement for when it is appropriate to use, the list goes on. I believe this class discussion was crucial to have. Every student should be aware of something that has the potential to effect us so dramatically. We also should have the space to freely discuss how we feel about it. The discussion we had was brought to our class in the right proportion and gave all of us the base information we need but...

News Media Critique

    Today, September16th, the Courier Journal posted an article about a Wyoming guide killed by a grizzly bear while looking for an elk in the Teton Wilderness. Click here to read the article. The report violated the element of good journalism newsworthiness.      In order to determine if something is newsworthy, the question, "Does it effect a lot of people for a long time?" must be answered. Without even reading the article, the answer to that question is clear. No, a random guide from Wyoming getting killed does not effect a lot of people for a long time. It was one occurrence that would only effect locals and close family. In general, this story was not deserving of publishing at all however, if it were more thematic it would possibly be relevant enough for publication. For example, if the report talked about a trend of grizzly bears attacking people very often in specific environments, that would effect a much larger group of people. It would make peopl...

Response to John's "Ancient Printing Discussion"

In John's blog he discussed the conversation we had in class on Ancient printing, how it evolved and effected societies. John's insight and perspective gave me a new look into the topic. Admittedly, during class I felt this topic was the least interesting we had hit so far. Although I find history very interesting, a decent amount of our conversation in class simply covered how things were printed, whereas I find the effects things have on society more interesting. Inferentially, you may guess I was most captivated by the section of the discussion where we talked about how higher levels of society rejected the metal printing type press made by Gutenberg. John went a further step as to relate this to how those in power today take advantage of printing press to tell us what they want us to hear but how we can still reply on good journalists to tell us what we need to hear. This thought pushes me to think more in depth of the pros and cons of freedom of press.