Skip to main content

Response to Betsy DeVos allegedly looking into giving teachers firearms.

     Until it appeared on our first current events quiz, I was unaware that the possibility of arming teachers with guns was truly being looked into. Although it is still just being researched and not actually happening right now, Mr. Miller believes it eventually will, even though the concept is very flawed. He explained that as a teacher he would not be comfortable in possession of a gun nor having students in close proximity to them. The class discussed the possible issues with having guns in schools; a misfiring, a student taking one for his or her own use, poor personal judgement for when it is appropriate to use, the list goes on. I believe this class discussion was crucial to have. Every student should be aware of something that has the potential to effect us so dramatically. We also should have the space to freely discuss how we feel about it. The discussion we had was brought to our class in the right proportion and gave all of us the base information we need but as the story develops I believe it should be brought back up.
     More personally, I believe bringing guns into schools is a disastrous idea with no legal grounds to support it. The Student Support and Academic Enrichment grants, a $1 billion dollar program created in  2015, is where the National Department of Education would get the funds to provide school teachers with guns. The explicit purpose of the program is to provide a well rounded education, improve school conditions for learning, and improve the use of technology for digital literacy. Although the grants give school districts the power to create policies based on their specific needs, the "drug and violence prevention" section names safe schools as weapon free. According to the New York Times, department officials are also aware that the purchase of these firearms would be the first time a federal agency has authorized the purchase of weapons without congressional mandate. Furthermore, purchasing firearms for schools would go against the School Safety Bill which prohibits their use. Although Betsy DeVos could technically use her discretion to bring guns into schools nationwide, it would be blatantly unethical. There is no logic behind bringing more guns into schools when guns are the issue to begin with. Most gun supporters would argue that it's not the guns fault, its the persons but what makes a teacher qualified to use a gun when they are trained to teach? We would be putting thousands of lives at risk. Most importantly, Students should have the first say on if they believe it is the most safe choice. Many may feel that having guns nearby would disrupt their peace and distract their learning. It is our lives at risk and we deserve a voice.  

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Non-newsworthy Story on WHAS

WHAS posted an article on their website announcing that the band KISS' final tour will make a stop at the KFC Yum! Center here in Louisville. While I'm sure there is a decent amount of people who would like to know this, it is not newsworthy. This story will not effect a lot of people for a long time and it's just celebrity fluff. The concert will come and go and people will have a good time but it isn't life changing and not everybody likes KISS. Therefore this article already is only relevant to a small amount of people, those who like the band. While those people would want to know about this, the front spread of a news website is not the place for it. By putting this story on the front page WHAS stole room for other stories that would serve much more valuable to its viewers. Click here to see article.

In-class Topic: Television

It isn't hard to realize that TV's are extremely popular. Things like Netflix, Hulu, Firestick, Xbox, Wii, etc. all add to the draw of Television. All of these things are made primarily to be used on a TV. Why? Because the creators know that most people have TV's and use them frequently. Since they came out, TV's have ruled the world of media. There are newspapers and magazines still, but they have greatly demassified. Both of those mediums show ads, tell stories and give news. Television offers all of those things in better ways. TV ads are more interesting, TV offers numerous news channels, and you can find plenty of shows focused on entertainment or information. In addition, you don't have to read TV which I think is a lure for many people, particularly the younger population. Since their invention, TV's have become more and more of household items. Today, it is rare to go into a home without one. Because they are so normalized, the youngest generation see...

Non-newsworthy Story on WHAS

Today, WHAS posted on their website a story about a body being found in a duffle bag in Indiana, which authorities are now investigating. While this article tells citizens what's going on around them and it tells the truth, it is not newsworthy for numerous reasons. There is not a clear goal of telling people of the crime, it does not impact a lot of people for a long time, and the article only has quotes from the police, no witnesses, family members, or anybody else, making it one sided. While the death of the man found will most likely have a tremendous impact on his family, it does not impact the whole city. Furthermore, while there is freedom of speech, what if the family of the man, or the man, did not want his death publicly announced; especially considering the circumstances? Small crimes like these get reported all the time but are rarely remembered by people. They momentarily remind people of the daily dangers our world presents and for many people, crime is entertainment...